Dear Hong Xu,
> Rework for AT91SAM9RL SoC, makes it build again.
> arch/arm/include/asm/arch-at91/at91sam9rl_matrix.h | 121 +++++---------
When I compare at91sam9rl_matrix.h to at91sam9260_matrix.h there is only
one subtle difference:
at91sam9260_matrix.h:
struct at91_matrix {
u32 mcfg[16]; /* Master Configuration Registers */
u32 scfg[16]; /* Slave Configuration Registers */
u32 pras[16][2]; /* Priority Assignment Slave Registers */
u32 mrcr; /* Master Remap Control Register */
u32 filler[0x06];
u32 ebicsa; /* EBI Chip Select Assignment Register */
at91sam9rl_matrix.h:
struct at91_matrix {
u32 mcfg[16]; /* Master Configuration Registers */
u32 scfg[16]; /* Slave Configuration Registers */
u32 pras[16][2]; /* Priority Assignment Slave Registers */
u32 mrcr; /* Master Remap Control Register */
u32 filler[7];
u32 ebicsa; /* EBI Chip Select Assignment Register */
};
1. Is it really filler[7] for the 9rl - can you verify with the data
sheet?
2. It seems there is a possibility to unify all those _matrix files into
one in the future (we are not going to do this now!) ?
Best Regards,
Reinhard
_______________________________________________
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
