On Jul 28, 2011, at 2:11 PM, Wolfgang Denk wrote: > Dear York Sun, > > In message <1311879751.29459.24.camel@oslab-l1> you wrote: >> >> I don't agree one line with the module information corrupts the boot >> messages. Do we have fixed format? Am I missing something? > > Yes, we have a well defined format with clear indentation. Just see > my commit message for what I mean. > >> I didn't count the time but don't think the one line message will add >> much to boot time. And it does have real value even you don't use it. > > No, it will not add much. But 100 characters at 115kbps is another 10 > milliseconds wasted for nothing. > > It may have value to you, but for 99.X % of the users it is completey > meaningless.
Its quite helpful for debug of customer issues. Should we add a CONFIG_ option for this? >>> Then feel free to add a custom command to display this specific >>> information, but keep it off the regular, unconditionally printed boot >>> messages. >> >> That's another way to do it. But we don't have to add a new command if a >> simple message does the job. > > Guess you have to, as I will not accept adding too much verbosity in > the boot messages. On contrary, I'm planning for some more patches to > get rid of the uncontrolled rank growth that happened in the past. > > Best regards, > > Wolfgang Denk - k _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
