On Fri, Dec 19, 2025 at 11:04:07AM +0530, Balaji Selvanathan wrote:
> Hi Tom,
> 
> Apologies for late reply. Somehow missed the mail.
> 
> Upon analysis, it seems the most likely root cause is Tony's 238GB disk
> triggers the CONFIG_SYS_64BIT_LBA code path in scsi_read function. Any read
> beyond block 268,435,455 blocks enters this path.
> 
> 'blks' is decremented both inside the 64-bit LBA block AND after successful
> scsi_exec(), causing incorrect block count tracking and (most likely) the
> data abort observed.
> 
> The fix is to remove 'blks -= blocks;' from inside the CONFIG_SYS_64BIT_LBA
> block in scsi_read() function.
> 
> Hi Tony, can you please check with this change?
> 
> Tom, shall I raise a new patch for this now?

Thanks for looking in to this now. Yes, please post a proper patch for
it so Tony can test and add a Tested-by if it works, that'll make
pulling to master before release easiest.

-- 
Tom

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to