On 12/13/25 12:36 PM, Peng Fan wrote:
Hi Marek,
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] clk: scmi: Fix name defer
On 12/12/25 7:32 AM, Peng Fan wrote:
Hello Peng,
Subject: [PATCH 0/2] clk: scmi: Fix name defer
I see this patchset is delegated to you, mainly because patch 2 is to
fix imx95-blk-ctrl. Since this patchset is based on Patrice's clk scmi
fixes, I am thinking to pick all the scmi fixes including this
patchset to send a PR to Tom for master soon.
Please don't, I think this implementation has unresolved questions and
frankly, I also think this is completely wrong approach. You should
model the relationship between clock in DT using "clock" property and
phandles, and then let the U-Boot clock core resolve those
relationships.
Ah, I need to give a look to model it in DT, but the DT is already in
Linux Upstream. Driver using current DT is broken.
Without this fix, we need to live with it in this release cycle.
Updating DT and drivers requires more time.
How does this even work in Linux ? The clock relationships must be
somehow established there too, right ?
Note that you can always use -u-boot.dtsi to add u-boot specific tweaks,
ST does it extensively anyway.
