Hi Mike,
[...]
> not really. i consider this to be "garbage-in garbage-out". imo,
> u-boot isnt a C library that should be padded with garbage checking
> all over. the result only helps broken systems (edge cases) while
> hindering the rest.
>
> i wouldnt have a problem with adopting an NDEBUG system, or perhaps
> adding assert()'s to this code. then people can easily opt-out of it
> all and for the people doing development, can easily turn things on.
> assert(name != NULL);
While developing, I certainly appreciate 'garbage-in error-out' and as
your approach allows this, I believe we have reached a consensus.
> the current miiphy system needs to be replaced (this runtime string
> based approach is crazy), but that's a completely different topic :).
I'm looking forward to your changes :)
Thanks!
Detlev
--
By all means let's be open-minded, but not so open-minded that our
brains drop out.
-- Richard Dawkins
--
DENX Software Engineering GmbH, MD: Wolfgang Denk & Detlev Zundel
HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany
Phone: (+49)-8142-66989-40 Fax: (+49)-8142-66989-80 Email: d...@denx.de
_______________________________________________
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
