> Now, let's assume someone still wants raw mode (and [1] suggests that > there might be cases), the raw sector mode is not so desirable because > it forces you to place the binary at a specific location on the disk, > requiring that to be synchronized with your image layout (such as a wks > file). Given that the romloader happily uses part-by-id, I would prefer > that for the SPL as well. Still, if someone configures another mode, > that should still work (when providing the right magic sector value).
Doesn't matter I had completed all three modes boot with minimum change on latest u-boot. I do check your patch include indeed is bug. I will pass out patches and this group members should help a bit. Just need to finish checking that the fat boot is not affected. Old u-boot-with-spl.sfp on my patches should run w/o issue. I will acknowledge your work with no worries. Then let T.F. see which is better for u-boot mainstream as well as Tom. Thanks, Brian
