On 11/13/25 8:33 PM, Simon Glass wrote:

Hello Simon,

diff --git a/drivers/core/ofnode.c b/drivers/core/ofnode.c
index 071d998a0a5..55c2b3a10bb 100644
--- a/drivers/core/ofnode.c
+++ b/drivers/core/ofnode.c
@@ -335,7 +335,7 @@ bool ofnode_name_eq_unit(ofnode node, const char *name)
  int ofnode_read_u8(ofnode node, const char *propname, u8 *outp)
  {
         const u8 *cell;
-       int len;
+       int len, off;

         assert(ofnode_valid(node));
         log_debug("%s: %s: ", __func__, propname);
@@ -343,8 +343,13 @@ int ofnode_read_u8(ofnode node, const char *propname, u8 
*outp)
         if (ofnode_is_np(node))
                 return of_read_u8(ofnode_to_np(node), propname, outp);

-       cell = fdt_getprop(gd->fdt_blob, ofnode_to_offset(node), propname,
-                          &len);
+       off = ofnode_to_offset(node);
+       if (off < 0) {
+               log_debug("(not valid)\n");
+               return -EINVAL;
+       }

Ugh this is really horrible, sorry :-)

Better to put a wrapper around it than add all these checks, extra
code size, etc. Also in many cases the ofnode is known to be valid(TM)
so it might just be a waste.

How would you propose the wrapper should look like ?

Keep in mind, not everything is fdt_getprop( ... ofnode_to_offset() ...) in this patch.

--
Best regards,
Marek Vasut

Reply via email to