On Wed, Oct 29, 2025 at 12:16:09PM +0100, Quentin Schulz wrote: > From: Quentin Schulz <[email protected]> > > This simplifies the "depends on" since we don't need DM_PWM listed > explicitly there as it already is made explicit via the surrounding > "if". No intended change in behavior. > > Signed-off-by: Quentin Schulz <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Tom Rini <[email protected]> > --- > Note that I believe PWM_SANDBOX should also depend on DM_PWM but I'm not > sure how to make sure of that. The PWM sandbox test is explicitly only > built when DM_PWM=y instead of SANDBOX_PWM=y (is that another issue?). Yes, it's DM_PWM only, and so could be moved there. The test in test/dm/pwm.c is specifically only for sandbox but that's true of all of test/dm/ and so UT_DM depends on sandbox and so that Makefile part is fine. -- Tom
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
