Addition: As I read a bit about FDT it does not replace ATAGS (http://elinux.org/Device_Trees) - it is more a supplement to it. So it would not harm to implement minimal ATAGS support and later add the FDT to it.
I started a prototype for ATAGS creation by modifying bootm.c - which seems (so long) not be too hard. If this works and doesn't add too much overhead FDT support is not that much a problem IMHO. Regards Simon (Sorry Detlev for the repost - forgot the ML...) _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
