On Thu, Jun 30, 2011 at 18:57, Wolfgang Denk wrote: > Mike Frysinger wrote: >> On Thu, Jun 30, 2011 at 17:10, Wolfgang Denk wrote: >> > Indeed, such a branch can be helpful. Also a pull request for it. =A0But >> > we're talking about the _original_ patches. >> >> and that's what my serial/post/sf patches ended up being. should i > > You don't want to understand, right? You posted _new_ patches. > There is a chance that these might actually be identical to any > previously posted ones, but my time is way too precious that I would > spend a single second on checking this, especially when you ignore > all rules (version marker in the Subject, change log in the comment > section).
and like i *already* said, i verified that the patches just posted match the ones already posted in the past by downloading them from patchwork and doing a diff on them. > I have already wasted way too much time on this stupid issue. I do > not intend to continue this discussion. so basically you're permanently NAK-ing all my patches even though i'm trying to find a way forward. awesome. -mike _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
