On Tue, Jun 28, 2011, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> - The cleanup after the reorganization of the ARM code has not been
> completed yet. At the moment, approapprox, 100+ ARM boards are
> *broken* and *do not compile*.
>
> Board maintainers or other interested parties are requested to
> adapt their boards within the current merge window. All boards that
> have not been fixed within the first week of the merge window are
> considered unmaintained and without interest to the community and
> will be removed.
It's funny how this reminds me of package build failures in Debian; in
such cases, we start by publishing the list of affected packages
ideally with links to build logs and the name of corresponding
maintainers. After a while, we actually start Cc:ing the maintainers
or filing bug reports against each failing package.
Would it make sense to publish such a list of broken boards and
corresponding maintainers? (Maybe some makeall + scripts magic?)
This is a sample list of Debian packages not declaring the upstream
"Homepage" properly:
http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2011/02/msg00367.html
--
Loïc Minier
_______________________________________________
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
