On 8/11/25 10:57 AM, Philip Oberfichtner wrote:
On Thu, Aug 07, 2025 at 03:41:57PM +0200, Marek Vasut wrote:
On 8/7/25 12:24 PM, Philip Oberfichtner wrote:
For coherency, use the same help text for all related size checks
options. Furthermore, simplify the depends-on logic.
Signed-off-by: Philip Oberfichtner <p...@denx.de>
---
Notes:
Changes in v2: new
Kconfig | 8 +++-----
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/Kconfig b/Kconfig
index ec20603883b..490a706101a 100644
--- a/Kconfig
+++ b/Kconfig
@@ -543,10 +543,8 @@ config BOARD_SIZE_LIMIT
default 1048576 if RCAR_64
default 0
help
- Maximum size of the U-Boot image. When defined, the build system
- checks that the actual size does not exceed it. This does not
- include SPL nor TPL, on platforms that use that functionality, they
- have separate options to restrict size.
+ Specifies the maximum length of the U-Boot image.
+ If this value is zero, it is ignored.
This makes the description less accurate, sorry, NAK.
What about using just the first half:
Maximum size of the U-Boot image. When defined, the build system
checks that the actual size does not exceed it.
[plus/minus treatment of the value zero]
And dropping the remainder "This does not include ..."?
Why would removing the SPL/TPL clarification be any improvement ?
