> -----Original Message-----
> From: Heiko Schocher <h...@denx.de>
> Sent: Saturday, 19 July 2025 12:21 pm
> To: Tom Rini <tr...@konsulko.com>
> Cc: u-boot@lists.denx.de; Frank Wunderlich <li...@fw-web.de>; Padmarao
> Begari <padmarao.beg...@amd.com>; Maniyam, Dinesh
> <dinesh.mani...@altera.com>; Holger Brunck <holger.brunck@hitachi-
> powergrids.com>
> Subject: Re: Please pull u-boot-i2c master
> 
> [CAUTION: This email is from outside your organization. Unless you trust the
> sender, do not click on links or open attachments as it may be a fraudulent 
> email
> attempting to steal your information and/or compromise your computer.]
> 
> Hello Tom,
> 
> On 18.07.25 17:01, Tom Rini wrote:
> > On Thu, Jul 17, 2025 at 08:10:17AM +0200, Heiko Schocher wrote:
> >
> >> Hello Tom,
> >>
> >> The following changes since commit
> 53bd87651e45b32efa398dd5e433d8b93d781445:
> >>
> >>    block: sandbox: Add support for SYS_64BIT_LBA (2025-07-11 11:33:25
> >> -0600)
> >>
> >> are available in the Git repository at:
> >>
> >>    https://source.denx.de/u-boot/custodians/u-boot-i2c.git
> >> i2c-for-2025.10
> >>
> >> for you to fetch changes up to
> 5e80c6757378d09950235083533e7a7c3aeae3be:
> >>
> >>    configs: agilex5_defconfig: Enable i3c configs for agilex5
> >> (2025-07-16 09:33:54 +0200)
> >>
> >> ----------------------------------------------------------------
> >> i2c updates for v2025.10
> >>
> >> - i2c Kconfig updates from Tom
> >>    - add some driver dependencies
> >>    - added missing include delay.h in iproc_i2c.c
> >>
> >> - i2c: muxes: Add PCA9541 i2c arbitrator driver
> >>    from Padmarao Begari
> >>
> >> - pca954x: add pca9545 support
> >>    from Frank Wunderlich
> >>
> >> - cmd: i2c: fix build when CFG_SYS_I2C_NOPROBES defined with DM_I2C
> >>    From Holger Brunck
> >>
> >> - added i3c support to U-Boot and enable it for agilex5
> >>    board from Dinesh Maniyam
> >
> > Unfortunately the i3c support leads to this in coreboot:
> > https://source.denx.de/u-boot/u-boot/-/jobs/1202949/raw
> >
> > Which looks like coreboot just gets stuck in a loop? And in turn, that
> > lead me to do this locally:
> > commit 03e9d5f4c61cba5d8e1db81d759fefd622b3ad49
> > Author: Tom Rini <tr...@konsulko.com>
> > Date:   Thu Jul 17 15:22:08 2025 -0600
> >
> >      hack drop generic changes
> >
> >      Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <tr...@konsulko.com>
> >
> > diff --git a/include/dm/device.h b/include/dm/device.h index
> > c5cfa18d09d6..678cd83c2716 100644
> > --- a/include/dm/device.h
> > +++ b/include/dm/device.h
> > @@ -169,7 +169,6 @@ enum {
> >    * @dma_offset: Offset between the physical address space (CPU's) and the
> >    *          device's bus address space
> >    * @iommu: IOMMU device associated with this device
> > - * @of_node: Associated device tree node
> >    */
> >   struct udevice {
> >       const struct driver *driver;
> > @@ -202,7 +201,6 @@ struct udevice {
> >   #if CONFIG_IS_ENABLED(IOMMU)
> >       struct udevice *iommu;
> >   #endif
> > -     struct device_node      *of_node;
> >   };
> >
> >   static inline int dm_udevice_size(void)
> 
> Uff.. yep, overseen this change...
> 
> > Which leads me (a) being concerned about what our coreboot support is
> > up to and (b) why i3c needs this generic change? And I don't just want
> > to see CONFIG_IS_ENABLED()'ing it, why do we have to handle the device
> > tree that way and is there no standard mechanism we can use?
> >
> 
> @dinesh: why do you need this?
> 
> It should be possible in the master driver to get the of pointer with
> 
> 
> ofnode node = dev_ofnode(dev);
> 
> and if you really need it in drivers/i3c/master.c pass it to the functions 
> you call...
> ah, no, as you already save the udevice in i3c_master_controller, you can 
> simply
> use
> 
> dev_ofnode(dev)
> 
> in it!
> 
> You can simply drop of_node from generic file, and use dev_ofnode(dev) in your
> driver/i3c code ... may you save the udevice in private data or in your
> i3c_dev_boardinfo struct instead if really needed, so please rework that part.
> 
> @Tom: I will drop i3c support from my pull request and send a new one
> 
> And yes, the question a) remains ...
> 
> Thanks!
> 
> bye,
> Heiko

Yes agreed! I can use dev_ofnode(dev) and will quickly rework on this part.

Thanks
Dinesh

> --
> DENX Software Engineering GmbH, Managing Director: Johanna Denk, Tabea Lutz
> HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany
> Phone: +49-8142-66989-52   Fax: +49-8142-66989-80   Email: h...@denx.de

Reply via email to