On Tue, Jul 08, 2025 at 03:32:55PM +0100, Andrew Goodbody wrote:
> On 08/07/2025 15:16, Johannes Thumshirn wrote:
> > On 08.07.25 13:35, Andrew Goodbody wrote:
> >> multi is guaranteed to be NULL in the first two error exit paths so the
> >> attempt to free it is not needed. Remove those calls.
> >>
> >> This issue found by Smatch.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Andrew Goodbody <andrew.goodb...@linaro.org>
> >> ---
> >>    fs/btrfs/volumes.c | 2 --
> >>    1 file changed, 2 deletions(-)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/fs/btrfs/volumes.c b/fs/btrfs/volumes.c
> >> index 5726981b19c..71b0b55b9c6 100644
> >> --- a/fs/btrfs/volumes.c
> >> +++ b/fs/btrfs/volumes.c
> >> @@ -972,12 +972,10 @@ int __btrfs_map_block(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info, 
> >> int rw,
> >>    again:
> >>            ce = search_cache_extent(&map_tree->cache_tree, logical);
> >>            if (!ce) {
> >> -          kfree(multi);
> >>                    *length = (u64)-1;
> >>                    return -ENOENT;
> >>            }
> >>            if (ce->start > logical) {
> >> -          kfree(multi);
> >>                    *length = ce->start - logical;
> >>                    return -ENOENT;
> > 
> > What tree are you working against? __btrfs_map_block() is "gone" since
> > cd4efd210edf ("btrfs: rename __btrfs_map_block to btrfs_map_block")
> > which is more than two years old.
> 
> master
> 
> https://source.denx.de/u-boot/u-boot/-/blob/master/fs/btrfs/volumes.c?ref_type=heads#L975
> 
> I am not seeing the commit you mention in master or -next.

So it's in u-boot sources, hard to notice (just by u-boot in CC list),
the paths are same as in kernel so it's confusing.

Reply via email to