On Tue, Jun 10, 2025 at 04:18:50PM +0100, Ben Dooks wrote: > Test for big-endian either via __RISCVEB__ which migth be > rather old, or check the BYTE_ORDER if the compiler defines > it (which should be any modern gcc like v12) > > Signed-off-by: Ben Dooks <ben.do...@codethink.co.uk> > --- > arch/riscv/include/asm/byteorder.h | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/arch/riscv/include/asm/byteorder.h > b/arch/riscv/include/asm/byteorder.h > index d26ac5688fa..3140c1f585e 100644 > --- a/arch/riscv/include/asm/byteorder.h > +++ b/arch/riscv/include/asm/byteorder.h > @@ -26,7 +26,7 @@ > # define __SWAB_64_THRU_32__ > #endif > > -#ifdef __RISCVEB__ > +#if defined(__RISCVEB__) || (defined(__BYTE_ORDER__) && __BYTE_ORDER__ == > __ORDER_BIG_ENDIAN__) > #include <linux/byteorder/big_endian.h> > #else > #include <linux/byteorder/little_endian.h>
What's this look like in the linux kernel? We should likely just mirror that. -- Tom
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
