Dear Peter Pan, Am 13.06.2011 um 06:17 schrieb Peter Pan:
> Our product is used in a safety-critical situation. We want to make > sure that the product we released is exactly the one we tested in our > labs. > Because our product is released in a checkout-build-release process, > it is impossible to just give out the binary file we tested. Why don't you just test the binary that was built for release? > 2011/6/12 Mike Frysinger <vap...@gentoo.org>: >> On Saturday, June 11, 2011 02:55:41 Wolfgang Denk wrote: >>> No, as the image contains a time stamp that changes each time you >>> build a new image. >> >> i wonder if we should make this a config tweak. some people (not really >> myself) would like to be able to confirm the same result every time and the >> timestamp is an acceptable loss ... The build-timestamp is an quite usable parameter, if it is configurable it should be opt-out. When I looked for the char *version_string I found out this is defined in respective architecture board.c. Shouldn't this be defined somewhere else to have always the same string? regards Andreas Bießmann _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
