resent to right list ...
Dear Reinhard Meyer,
Am 09.06.2011 11:21, schrieb Reinhard Meyer:
> Dear Andreas Bießmann,
>> This patch enables the new clock features from new libat91-common. This
>> is a required step to get at91rm9200_usart replaced by atmel_usart
>> driver.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Andreas Bießmann <andreas.de...@googlemail.com>
>>
>> Cc: Jens Scharsig <js_at...@scharsoft.de>
>> Cc: Eric Bénard <e...@eukrea.com>
>
> I think this should go into NEXT unleass it unbreaks that board right now.
> You mentioned in another mail that it would be ok to be in 2011.09.
> Is that OK?
I'm fine with that. The arm920t/at91 boards do build (with minor
warnings in at91_emac and at91rm9200_usart) and work on real hardware
since 9e8df9c4db7835152996c96cc432dc6dd70bb17c
The warnings are:
- 'at91_emac.c:487:2: warning: dereferencing type-punned pointer will
break strict-aliasing rules' in at91_emac -> you know about that
... it is the same as in macb driver and will also be fixed soon.
- 'at91rm9200_usart.c:39:2: warning: #warning Please update to use C
structur SoC access !' -> at91rm9200_usart will be removed soon
Therefore I do not see any reason to remove those arm920t/at91 boards.
I will do some more testing with atmel_usart driver on atrm9200 devices
and send for review this weekend. The big removal of old-style
at91rm9200 boards can begin after that cause the deprecated
at91rm9200_usart driver needs some outdated stuff which will also be
removed in that step.
Besides that, I found out cpu.c (in that commit) is missing a GPL header
and copyright notice. So please do not add this version.
regards
Andreas Bießmann
_______________________________________________
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
