Hi Tom, On Tue, 29 Apr 2025 at 08:53, Tom Rini <tr...@konsulko.com> wrote: > > On Tue, Apr 29, 2025 at 08:35:24AM -0600, Simon Glass wrote: > > Hi Tom, > > > > On Tue, 29 Apr 2025 at 07:48, Tom Rini <tr...@konsulko.com> wrote: > > > > > > On Tue, Apr 29, 2025 at 07:21:57AM -0600, Simon Glass wrote: > > > > > > > This series moves patman to use asyncio instead of ThreadPoolExecutor > > > > since it makes it easier to handle requests sent from different parts > > > > of the code. > > > > > > > > It also includes some updates to bring patman in line with the other > > > > major Python tools (buildman and binman). > > > > > > > > With this series, we have a better basis to add support for syncing more > > > > data from a patchwork server. > > > > > > > > After this, the next step it to add a new 'patman series' subcommand, to > > > > track and manage series workflow. > > > > > > This conflicts with master, please rebase this if you intend for it to > > > be merged to mainline. > > > > I will take a look and see what patches my tree is missing. > > > > > And to avoid confusion, while I think managing > > > these python projects in this manner (and not AFAICT following python > > > best practices) makes life harder for everyone else, that is not me > > > NAK'ing taking more patches, I continue to be compromising and "Saying > > > Yes" to things you do that I disagree with on non-arbitrary technical > > > grounds. > > > > I'm open to managing them in my tree if that helps. For now it seems > > like too much work to manage them separately, but if someone wants to > > volunteer to help, I could do it. > > Again, if you won't manage them standalone as seems to be normal best > practice,
I wonder whether that was intended to throw shade at my approach, but if so I'll let it go. Anyway, I don't completely understand the best-practice argument, although I am open to it. It is extra work to set up CI, etc, but probably not a huge amount. If I get keen one day perhaps I will take a look. Just so many things on my plate already, as you know. > we'll just keep them in mainline. It's up to you if they > diverge or not, but it would be easy to avoid I would think. Yes I can't imagine it will be difficult as there are so few patches. Regards, Simon
