On Thu, Apr 24, 2025 at 12:55:15PM -0600, Tom Rini wrote: > On Thu, Apr 24, 2025 at 12:34:23PM -0600, Simon Glass wrote: > > Hi Tom, > > > > On Wed, 23 Apr 2025 at 08:08, Tom Rini <tr...@konsulko.com> wrote: > > > > > > On Tue, Apr 22, 2025 at 05:39:30PM -0600, Simon Glass wrote: > > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > Tom has indicated that he would like Patman to move out of his tree. I > > > > suggested on another thread[1] that I maintain it in my 'sjg' tree, so > > > > here is a new thread to discuss this. > > > > > > > > I have already done this for the qemu/efi/coreboot scripts as Tom has > > > > NAK'ed patches for those. > > > > > > > > For the other tools there is going to be quite a bit of churn, as I > > > > would like to resolve most of the many Python warnings. > > > > > > > > Given the shared source between the tools, it would be easier for me > > > > to do the same for buildman, binman and qconfig. I am thinking that I > > > > might try a move to allow Gitlab pull-requests for reviews on these as > > > > well as the mailing list, if that is useful. > > > > > > > > For tools which need to sync back to Tom's tree (i.e. not patman), I > > > > or Tom could do a pull request every now and then, omitting any > > > > changes that relate to pylint. > > > > > > > > Please let me know your thoughts. The timing is good as I am going to > > > > be sending out a new Patman feature in the next few weeks and it is a > > > > few thousand more lines of code. > > > > > > My biggest objection to all of this is that you should NOT use > > > sjg.u-boot.org as that perpetuates your abusing owning u-boot.org. As I > > > said in the thread, it should be under https://source.denx.de/u-boot/ > > > somewhere and you should be the one to own it there. > > > > I wish you would stop bringing this up. Until things change, that is > > unfortunately what I have to do, to avoid being blocked. > > I really wish you would stop holding the project domain hostage. I will > not stop bringing up that you are holding the project domain hostage > because you are holding the project domain hostage. > > I am in fact getting close to my breaking point of you and your holding > of the project domain hostage.
And since you don't like me pointing this out, would you transfer the domain to either: - Myself (the head of the project) - DENX (whom I am volunteering on the spur of the moment, sorry) who otherwise run the projects general infrastructure ? -- Tom
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
