On Tue, 7 Jun 2011 09:09:07 -0400 Ben Gardiner <bengardi...@nanometrics.ca> wrote:
> > Why not call drop_ffs before this point? > > To achieve the desired effect, drop_ffs must be called on each > eraseblock sized chunk being written; so it seemed the simplest way > was to force a block-by-block pass with the !WITH_DROP_FFS to enter Ah, I missed that it was within each erase block. > In v4 I will add a -EINVAL if WITH_YAFFS_OOB flag is used with any other flag. OK, I just didn't want it silently ignored, with no documentation of the limitation. -Scott _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
