On Mon, Apr 07, 2025 at 10:49:11PM +1200, Simon Glass wrote:
> Hi Heinrich,
>
> On Mon, 7 Apr 2025 at 19:57, Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.g...@gmx.de> wrote:
> >
> > On 07.04.25 03:35, Simon Glass wrote:
> > > This function doesn't have a great name, since we talk of devices being
> > > active once they are probed.
> > >
> > > Rename it to dm_remove_dma_devices().
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <s...@chromium.org>
> > > Suggested-by: Jonas Karlman <jo...@kwiboo.se>
> > > ---
> > >
> > > (no changes since v1)
> > >
> > > arch/arm/lib/bootm.c | 4 ++--
> > > arch/riscv/lib/bootm.c | 2 +-
> > > arch/x86/lib/bootm.c | 2 +-
> > > drivers/core/root.c | 2 +-
> > > include/dm/root.h | 6 +++---
> > > lib/efi_loader/efi_boottime.c | 2 +-
> > > test/dm/core.c | 2 +-
> > > 7 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/arch/arm/lib/bootm.c b/arch/arm/lib/bootm.c
> > > index 688c2f3f29b..ef859a2cd4c 100644
> > > --- a/arch/arm/lib/bootm.c
> > > +++ b/arch/arm/lib/bootm.c
> > > @@ -74,10 +74,10 @@ static void announce_and_cleanup(int fake)
> > > * Call remove function of all devices with a removal flag set.
> > > * This may be useful for last-stage operations, like cancelling
> > > * of DMA operation or releasing device internal buffers.
> > > - * dm_remove_devices_active() ensures that vital devices are
> > > removed in
> > > + * dm_remove_dma_devices() ensures that vital devices are removed in
> > > * a second round.
> > > */
> > > - dm_remove_devices_active();
> > > + dm_remove_dma_devices();
> > >
> > > cleanup_before_linux();
> > > }
> > > diff --git a/arch/riscv/lib/bootm.c b/arch/riscv/lib/bootm.c
> > > index 76c610bcee0..9aecaafef43 100644
> > > --- a/arch/riscv/lib/bootm.c
> > > +++ b/arch/riscv/lib/bootm.c
> > > @@ -57,7 +57,7 @@ static void announce_and_cleanup(int fake)
> > > * This may be useful for last-stage operations, like cancelling
> > > * of DMA operation or releasing device internal buffers.
> > > */
> > > - dm_remove_devices_active();
> > > + dm_remove_dma_devices();
> > >
> > > cleanup_before_linux();
> > > }
> > > diff --git a/arch/x86/lib/bootm.c b/arch/x86/lib/bootm.c
> > > index 3c420b00936..91e8de4e1ad 100644
> > > --- a/arch/x86/lib/bootm.c
> > > +++ b/arch/x86/lib/bootm.c
> > > @@ -50,7 +50,7 @@ void bootm_announce_and_cleanup(void)
> > > * This may be useful for last-stage operations, like cancelling
> > > * of DMA operation or releasing device internal buffers.
> > > */
> > > - dm_remove_devices_active();
> > > + dm_remove_dma_devices();
> > > }
> > >
> > > #if defined(CONFIG_OF_LIBFDT) && !defined(CONFIG_OF_NO_KERNEL)
> > > diff --git a/drivers/core/root.c b/drivers/core/root.c
> > > index c7fb58285ca..101cc4d43fa 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/core/root.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/core/root.c
> > > @@ -148,7 +148,7 @@ int dm_remove_devices_flags(uint flags)
> > > return 0;
> > > }
> > >
> > > -void dm_remove_devices_active(void)
> > > +void dm_remove_dma_devices(void)
> > > {
> > > /* Remove non-vital devices first */
> > > device_remove(dm_root(), DM_REMOVE_ACTIVE_ALL |
> > > DM_REMOVE_NON_VITAL);
> > > diff --git a/include/dm/root.h b/include/dm/root.h
> > > index 5651b868c8b..39a069cd465 100644
> > > --- a/include/dm/root.h
> > > +++ b/include/dm/root.h
> > > @@ -169,16 +169,16 @@ int dm_uninit(void);
> > > int dm_remove_devices_flags(uint flags);
> > >
> > > /**
> > > - * dm_remove_devices_active - Call remove function of all active drivers
> > > heeding
> > > + * dm_remove_dma_devices - Call remove function of all active drivers
> > > heeding
> > > * device dependencies as far as know, i.e.
> > > removing
> > > * devices marked with DM_FLAG_VITAL last.
> > > *
> > > * All active devices will be removed
> > > */
> > > -void dm_remove_devices_active(void);
> > > +void dm_remove_dma_devices(void);
> >
> > We have to remove all active devices. Not only DMA devices but also any
> > device that creates interrupts.
> >
> > The renaming is misleading.
>
> Yes, but so is the existing name, as mentioned.
>
> How about dm_remove_for_boot() ?I think the name itself is fine and maybe just a bit more documentation? It's dealing with the DM_REMOVE_ACTIVE_ALL flag after all. -- Tom
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
