On 4/1/25 12:57 PM, Alice Guo (OSS) wrote:
Hello Alice,
Both use same ID 0x19.
It is fine to use below, if it is fine to you.
SCMI_PROTOCOL_ID_PINCTRL_IMX = 0x19.
How does the kernel discern which driver it should use to communicate
with the SCMI provider if both drivers are compiled into the kernel ?
There is a check in drivers probe. Only one will succeed.
I have to admit, this is just ... uhhh :(
But I think now, we should also have a driver-side check and two separate
drivers, similar to this patch:
[PATCH] power: regulator: scmi: Move regulator subnode hack to
scmi_regulator
Hi Marek,
When will this patch "[PATCH] power: regulator: scmi: Move regulator subnode hack to
scmi_regulator" be applied to the uboot next branch? I have already made the next
version patch set based on this patch.
Fabio/Tom ?
