пт, 7 бер. 2025 р. о 21:05 Tom Rini <tr...@konsulko.com> пише: > > On Fri, Mar 07, 2025 at 12:16:29PM +0200, Svyatoslav Ryhel wrote: > > > The existing memory layout places the bloblist at 0xb000 and the fdt at > > 0x100, > > resulting in a 0xaf00 size constraint for the fdt. This constraint has been > > reached. Lets modify the layout by moving the bloblist to 0x100. With a > > bloblist size limit of 0x400, this allows the fdt to be positioned at 0x500, > > thus expanding its permissible size. > > > > Signed-off-by: Svyatoslav Ryhel <clamo...@gmail.com> > [snip] > > diff --git a/doc/arch/sandbox/sandbox.rst b/doc/arch/sandbox/sandbox.rst > > index a8b0d7f0395..99459815c25 100644 > > --- a/doc/arch/sandbox/sandbox.rst > > +++ b/doc/arch/sandbox/sandbox.rst > > @@ -658,8 +658,8 @@ that are mapped into that memory: > > ======== ======================== =============================== > > Addr Config Usage > > ======== ======================== =============================== > > - 100 CONFIG_SYS_FDT_LOAD_ADDR Device tree > > - b000 CONFIG_BLOBLIST_ADDR Blob list > > + 100 CONFIG_BLOBLIST_ADDR Blob list > > + 500 CONFIG_SYS_FDT_LOAD_ADDR Device tree > > 10000 CFG_MALLOC_F_ADDR Early memory allocation > > f0000 CONFIG_PRE_CON_BUF_ADDR Pre-console buffer > > 100000 TCG Event log TCG Event Log > > My question is do we have room or not to set aside 512KiB (as the > "should never be this large" value) instead of not quite 64KiB which we > can possibly hit again in the not too distant future? I think I checked > earlier and CFG_MALLOC_F_ADDR + CONFIG_SYS_MALLOC_F_LEN should still fit > below CONFIG_PRE_CON_BUF_ADDR if we do that (and also give the bloblist > some room to expand). >
I will configure and test everything but I cannot do anything without Simon agreement as the sandbox custodian and since he better knows this setup. > -- > Tom
