Hi Stephen, On Fri, 21 Feb 2025 at 18:04, Tom Rini <tr...@konsulko.com> wrote: > > On Fri, Feb 21, 2025 at 05:03:52PM -0800, Stephen Boyd wrote: > > Quoting Tom Rini (2025-02-20 17:07:11) > > > On Thu, Feb 20, 2025 at 12:58:47PM -0800, Stephen Boyd wrote: > > > > > > > Add a 'coreboot' cpu to armv8 that looks for the coreboot table near the > > > > top of the 4G address space. > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd <swb...@chromium.org> > > > > --- > > > > arch/arm/Kconfig | 2 ++ > > > > > > We can't really ask SYS_COREBOOT in two places, as unlike the kernel > > > everyone always parses arch/*/Kconfig, so we should move > > > arch/x86/cpu/coreboot/Kconfig to say arch/Kconfig.coreboot and do > > > something like: > > > config SYS_COREBOOT > > > bool "Support for booting u-boot as a coreboot payload" if ARM64 > > > depends on ARM64 || VENDOR_COREBOOT > > > default y if VENDOR_COREBOOT > > > > Ok, thanks. I'll do that. > > > > > > > > And then any of the sub-options that are imply'd by the existing stanza > > > in the x86 file aren't applicable to ARM64 they can be "... if X86". > > > > > > As similar to the work to make EFI payload be a more generic option > > > rather than x86 only, this too needs some thought to be easily > > > expandable to cover the ARM case today and I'll assume RISC-V at some > > > point in the future. > > > > > > > Do you have a pointer to that EFI work? > > No because it's still very much in progress over in Simon's personal > tree.
See here: https://sjg.u-boot.org/u-boot/u-boot/-/tree/efiq4?ref_type=heads Regards, Simon
