On Thu, Feb 27, 2025 at 12:31:59AM +0000, Peng Fan wrote: > Hi Andre, > > > Subject: [PATCH 1/2] sunxi: mmc: Fix T113-s3 MMC clock divider > > > > On the Allwinner D1/R528/T113-s3 SoCs the MMC clock source > > selected by mux value 1 is PLL_PERIPH0(1x), not (2x), as in the other > > SoCs. > > But we have still the hidden divisor of 2 in the MMC mod clock, so > > need to explicitly compensate for that on those SoCs. > > > > This leads to the actually programmed clock rate to be double > > compared to before, which increases the MMC performance on those > > SoCs. > > > > Signed-off-by: Andre Przywara <andre.przyw...@arm.com> > > Reported-by: Kuba Szczodrzyński <k...@szczodrzynski.pl> > > --- > > drivers/mmc/sunxi_mmc.c | 7 +++++++ > > 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+) > > > > diff --git a/drivers/mmc/sunxi_mmc.c b/drivers/mmc/sunxi_mmc.c > > index 0b56d1405be..8f72d758e46 100644 > > --- a/drivers/mmc/sunxi_mmc.c > > +++ b/drivers/mmc/sunxi_mmc.c > > @@ -92,6 +92,13 @@ static int mmc_set_mod_clk(struct > > sunxi_mmc_priv *priv, unsigned int hz) > > pll = CCM_MMC_CTRL_PLL6; > > pll_hz = clock_get_pll6(); > > #endif > > + /* > > + * On the D1/R528/T113 mux source 1 refers to > > PLL_PERIPH0(1x), > > + * like for the older SoCs. However we still have the > > hidden > > + * divider of 2x, so compensate for that here. > > + */ > > + if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_MACH_SUN8I_R528)) > > Use CONFIG_IS_ENABLED(MACH_SUN8I_R528)?
No, either is fine, IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_FOO) is less confusing for the case where there's never a CONFIG_xPL_FOO. -- Tom
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature