Am 25. Februar 2025 00:06:28 MEZ schrieb Simon Glass <s...@chromium.org>: >The values in the FADT are pointers so should not go through sandbox's >normal addr<->pointer mapping. Fix this. > >Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <s...@chromium.org> >--- > >Changes in v3: >- Add new patch to correct mapping in FADT > > cmd/acpi.c | 2 +- > lib/acpi/acpi_table.c | 4 ++-- > 2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) > >diff --git a/cmd/acpi.c b/cmd/acpi.c >index 094d9d4e858..2273176f106 100644 >--- a/cmd/acpi.c >+++ b/cmd/acpi.c >@@ -58,7 +58,7 @@ static void list_fadt(struct acpi_fadt *fadt) > dump_hdr(nomap_sysmem(fadt->x_dsdt, 0)); > else if (fadt->dsdt) > dump_hdr(nomap_sysmem(fadt->dsdt, 0)); >- if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_X86) && >+ if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_X86) && !IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_SANDBOX) &&
This looks like an unrelated change. Best regards Heinrich > !(fadt->flags & ACPI_FADT_HW_REDUCED_ACPI)) > log_err("FADT not ACPI-hardware-reduced-compliant\n"); > if (fadt->header.revision >= 3 && fadt->x_firmware_ctrl) >diff --git a/lib/acpi/acpi_table.c b/lib/acpi/acpi_table.c >index 150f75027a5..3805b61159e 100644 >--- a/lib/acpi/acpi_table.c >+++ b/lib/acpi/acpi_table.c >@@ -255,8 +255,8 @@ int acpi_write_fadt(struct acpi_ctx *ctx, const struct >acpi_writer *entry) > header->creator_revision = 1; > fadt->minor_revision = 2; > >- fadt->x_firmware_ctrl = map_to_sysmem(ctx->facs); >- fadt->x_dsdt = map_to_sysmem(ctx->dsdt); >+ fadt->x_firmware_ctrl = nomap_to_sysmem(ctx->facs); >+ fadt->x_dsdt = nomap_to_sysmem(ctx->dsdt); > > if (fadt->x_firmware_ctrl < 0x100000000ULL) > fadt->firmware_ctrl = fadt->x_firmware_ctrl;