On Thu, 20 Feb 2025 at 09:56, Quentin Schulz <foss+ub...@0leil.net> wrote:
>
> From: Quentin Schulz <quentin.sch...@cherry.de>
>
> This was only used on RK3288 Chromebooks and the EVB.
>
> If it follows the same pattern as for RK3399 Chromebooks where their
> maintainer (Simon) agreed[1] to removal of u-boot.rom on the basis that
> the generic u-boot-rockchip-spi.bin is now enough, let's do the same for
> RK3288 and remove the last Rockchip users of u-boot.rom (and HAS_ROM
> symbol).
>
> At the same time, remove HAS_ROM symbol from the RK3288 Chromebooks and
> EVB configs since they were used only for that.
>
> SYS_SPI_U_BOOT_OFFS offset in rockchip-u-boot.dtsi for the u-boot-img
> node of simple-bin-spi binman image matches the one used in u-boot.rom
> except for the EVB.
> The EVB doesn't have ROCKCHIP_SPI_IMAGE symbol enabled, so HAS_ROM had
> no effect anyway. Even if it had, this would not have been enough
> considering that SPL_SPI_LOAD symbol is not set, so U-Boot proper could
> not be loaded from SPI even if SPL/TPL does.
>
> Make sure u-boot-rockchip-spi.bin has the same size of u-boot.rom for
> Chromebooks as that seems to be important.
>
> [1] 
> https://lore.kernel.org/u-boot/caflszth-sewfod8deof3+e-wce1qff0cyxxr8cbqwy3brw3...@mail.gmail.com/
>
> Reviewed-by: Jonas Karlman <jo...@kwiboo.se>
> Signed-off-by: Quentin Schulz <quentin.sch...@cherry.de>
> ---
>  arch/arm/dts/rk3288-u-boot.dtsi        | 24 ------------------------
>  arch/arm/dts/rk3288-veyron-u-boot.dtsi |  8 ++++++++
>  arch/arm/mach-rockchip/rk3288/Kconfig  |  5 -----
>  3 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 29 deletions(-)

Tested-by: Simon Glass <s...@chromium.org>  # chromebook-kevin
Tested-by: Simon Glass <s...@chromium.org>  # chromebook-bob

Reply via email to