Update for the new xPL naming, which was missed in a previous patch
which purported to do this.

Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <s...@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Tom Rini <tr...@konsulko.com>
---

(no changes since v1)

 common/spl/spl_reloc.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/common/spl/spl_reloc.c b/common/spl/spl_reloc.c
index 324b98eaf98..216c0f36623 100644
--- a/common/spl/spl_reloc.c
+++ b/common/spl/spl_reloc.c
@@ -59,7 +59,7 @@ static int setup_layout(struct spl_image_info *image, ulong 
*addrp)
        uint need_size = image->size + image->fdt_size;
        margin = buf_size - need_size;
        log_debug("spl_reloc %s->%s: margin%s%lx limit %lx fdt_size %lx base 
%lx avail %x image %x fdt %lx need %x\n",
-                 spl_phase_name(spl_phase()), spl_phase_name(spl_phase() + 1),
+                 xpl_name(xpl_phase()), xpl_name(xpl_phase() + 1),
                  margin >= 0 ? " " : " -", abs(margin), limit, fdt_size, base,
                  buf_size, image->size, image->fdt_size, need_size);
        if (margin < 0) {
-- 
2.43.0

Reply via email to