On Sun, Jan 26, 2025 at 11:43:15AM -0700, Simon Glass wrote: > The size of some malloc() fields has reduced on 64-bit machines, but > the spl_reloc code was not updated. Fix this to avoid a compiler > warning. > > Also update for the new xPL naming.
There's no naming change made, otherwise:
Reviewed-by: Tom Rini <tr...@konsulko.com>
>
> Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <s...@chromium.org>
> ---
>
> common/spl/spl_reloc.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/common/spl/spl_reloc.c b/common/spl/spl_reloc.c
> index be8349b535b..324b98eaf98 100644
> --- a/common/spl/spl_reloc.c
> +++ b/common/spl/spl_reloc.c
> @@ -154,7 +154,7 @@ int spl_reloc_jump(struct spl_image_info *image,
> spl_jump_to_image_t jump)
> rcode_func loader;
> int ret;
>
> - log_debug("malloc usage %lx bytes (%ld KB of %d KB)\n", gd->malloc_ptr,
> + log_debug("malloc usage %x bytes (%d KB of %d KB)\n", gd->malloc_ptr,
> gd->malloc_ptr / 1024, CONFIG_VAL(SYS_MALLOC_F_LEN) / 1024);
>
> if (*image->stack_prot != STACK_PROT_VALUE) {
> --
> 2.43.0
>
--
Tom
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
