Le 23/05/2011 11:30, Alexander Holler a écrit : > Am 23.05.2011 11:06, schrieb Matthias Weisser: >> In some cases (e.g. bootm with a elf payload which is already at the right >> position) there is a in place copy of data to the same address. Catching this >> saves some ms while booting. >> >> Signed-off-by: Matthias Weisser<weiss...@arcor.de> >> --- >> arch/arm/lib/memcpy.S | 3 +++ >> 1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/arch/arm/lib/memcpy.S b/arch/arm/lib/memcpy.S >> index 3b5aeec..f655256 100644 >> --- a/arch/arm/lib/memcpy.S >> +++ b/arch/arm/lib/memcpy.S >> @@ -60,6 +60,9 @@ >> .globl memcpy >> memcpy: >> >> + cmp r0, r1 >> + moveq pc, lr >> + >> enter r4, lr >> >> subs r2, r2, #4 > > The standard clearly say to both memory regions should not overlap when > memcpy() is used, so I would say this is the wrong place to fix that.
I think the intent here is not to enforce the standard but to handle an actual, and degenerate, copy request in the most efficient manner, and in that respect, the patch does its job. Besides, if the patch was about enforcing the standard, then I would consider it highly more efficient to check the areas once in the memcpy function than duplicating this check before each call to the function, considering that the place where the copy happens is not necessarily the one where the source and destination were computed. > Regards, > > Alexander Amicalement, -- Albert. _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
