On Thu, Jan 16, 2025 at 08:52:38AM -0700, Simon Glass wrote: > Hi Tom, > > On Wed, 15 Jan 2025 at 16:32, Tom Rini <tr...@konsulko.com> wrote: [snip] > > I'm referring to the whole bootmeth/bootflow/etc thing. Is this going to > > be put to use by anyone / anywhere on PowerPC? M68K? MIPS? 32bit ARM is > > a harder question there, which is also where this particular overflow > > was. > > I'm still not sure what you are saying. Are you wanting to disable > bootstd by default / go back to distro scripts / force everyone to use > EFI_LOADER / ?
Yes, I'm asking where it's appropriate to enable this new functionality by default. It certainly should be enabled on arm64 (there's new designs) and riscv (there's new designs). It still ought to be enabled on arm32 because we otherwise lack a easy way to say "new" arm32 (say i.MX7) and not "old" arm32 (say i.MX23). What is the point of enabling this on PowerPC for example? The active users there are (generally) supporting legacy hardware and I have no idea how much they want to change their boot process, once bootstd supports flash for example. There's similar questions for everything else under arch/ as well. -- Tom
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature