On Sun, Dec 08, 2024 at 12:52:04PM +0200, Ilias Apalodimas wrote: > lmb_reserve() is just calling lmb_reserve_flags() with LMB_NONE. > There's not much we gain from this abstraction, so let's remove the > former and make the code a bit easier to follow. > > The code size increase is minimal - e.g for sandbox which includes all > of the LMB tests > > add/remove: 0/1 grow/shrink: 12/0 up/down: 46/-4 (42) > Function old new delta > lib_test_lmb_overlapping_reserve 1018 1030 +12 > version_string 70 76 +6 > test_get_unreserved_size 1032 1038 +6 > test_alloc_addr 2933 2939 +6 > test_multi_alloc.constprop 3034 3036 +2 > test_bigblock 911 913 +2 > load_serial 946 948 +2 > lib_test_lmb_flags 2101 2103 +2 > do_bootz 526 528 +2 > do_bootm_linux 2067 2069 +2 > bootm_run_states 5275 5277 +2 > boot_relocate_fdt 599 601 +2 > lmb_reserve 4 - -4 > Total: Before=2492742, After=2492784, chg +0.00% > > Signed-off-by: Ilias Apalodimas <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Tom Rini <[email protected]> -- Tom
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
