Hi Heinrich, On Tue, 3 Dec 2024 at 07:38, Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.g...@gmx.de> wrote: > > On 01.12.24 16:24, Simon Glass wrote: > > Rather than an integer, it is better to use the enum provided, when > > referring to an EFI memory-type. Update existing uses. > > > > Call the value 'mem_type' consistently. Fix up one instance of > > upper-case hex. > > > > Fix up the calls in struct efi_boot_services so that they use the same > > enum, adding the missing parameter names and enum efi_allocate_type. > > > > While we are here, rename the 'memory' parameter to 'memoryp' so that it > > is clear it is a return value. > > > > Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <s...@chromium.org> > > Simon, I have no clue why you keep ignoring reviews. > This is just annoying and won't lead to merging patches.
I got your feedback on [1] and incorporated it in v2 onwards. Did you notice? > > NAK Regards, Simon [1] https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/uboot/patch/20241125204456.1525752-7-...@chromium.org/
