On Mon, Dec 02, 2024 at 05:20:20PM -0700, Simon Glass wrote: > Hi Guillaume, > > On Mon, 2 Dec 2024 at 01:03, Guillaume LA ROQUE <glaro...@baylibre.com> wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > Le 30/11/2024 à 21:24, Simon Glass a écrit : > > > Hi Guillaume, > > > > > > On Thu, 28 Nov 2024 at 03:15, Guillaume La Roque <glaro...@baylibre.com> > > > wrote: > > >> For android vendor boot image version 4 bootconfig is mandatory.[1] > > >> > > >> In the android_image_get_ramdisk function, after copying both vendor and > > >> boot ramdisks, we extract all androidboot.* entries from the kernel > > >> command line. These entries are added to the bootconfig section. > > >> We then update the sizes of the ramdisk and bootconfig. > > >> Finally, all androidboot.* entries are removed from the kernel command > > >> line. > > >> > > >> [1] > > >> https://source.android.com/docs/core/architecture/partitions/vendor-boot-partitions#vendor-boot-partition-v4 > > >> Co-developed-by: Mattijs Korpershoek <mkorpersh...@baylibre.com> > > >> Signed-off-by: Mattijs Korpershoek <mkorpersh...@baylibre.com> > > >> Signed-off-by: Guillaume La Roque <glaro...@baylibre.com> > > >> --- > > >> boot/image-android.c | 29 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > > >> 1 file changed, 29 insertions(+) > > >> > > > I am not seeing any tests for this code. Can you please update the > > > test to cover this? > > i don't know if it's possible with test framework in uboot, to validate > > bootconfig raw partition is reading by android kernel. i don't really > > know how i can do this , if you can say me if it's something possible or > > not . > > We don't have a way to boot a kernel (yet), but we do have tests that > check things are correct - e.g. bootflow_android() - and after a > 'fake' boot - e.g. bootflow_scan_boot()
We already have a test that boots the kernel, test/py/tests/test_net_boot.py -- Tom
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
