On Sun, 10 Nov 2024 at 04:51, Christian Marangi <ansuels...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Fix broken dm_test_ofnode_phandle_ot test. They never actually worked > and were passing test by pure luck by having the same phandle index of > test.dts that coincicentally had #gpio-cells in the same index node. > > It was sufficient to add a phandle to test.dts to make the test fail. > > To correctly test these feature, make use oif the new OPs oftree to > parse phandle. > > For consistency with the dm_test_ofnode_phandle, rework the test and > other.dts to use the same property with the other- prefix to every > node. > > Also fix dm_test_ofnode_get_by_phandle_ot by making it more robust and > renaming the phandle property to other-phandle. > > Signed-off-by: Christian Marangi <ansuels...@gmail.com> > --- > arch/sandbox/dts/other.dts | 24 ++++++++++- > test/dm/ofnode.c | 83 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------- > 2 files changed, 91 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-) >
Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <s...@chromium.org>
