On Fri, Nov 08, 2024 at 08:23:49AM -0700, Simon Glass wrote: > It has become more common to use config fragments to extend or adjust > the functionality of boards in U-Boot. > > Propose a format for how to deal with this. It is not implemented as > yet. > > Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <s...@chromium.org>
I think that the first problem is that this patch series is an inappropriate method and place to start the discussion. I also think this gets things backwards as the common case is "make", not "buildman". We need more defconfig's that are just base + fragment(s) if they're important enough to be a combination that needs to be tested and work. A board is not a time-expensive part of CI. A pytest run is, a new job itself is. -- Tom
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
