Hi Quentin,
On 2024-11-07 13:01, Quentin Schulz wrote:
> Hi Jonas,
>
> On 11/2/24 9:37 PM, Jonas Karlman wrote:
>> Implement checkboard() to print current SoC model used by a board,
>> e.g. one of:
>>
>> SoC: RK3582 v1
>> SoC: RK3588 v0
>> SoC: RK3588 v1
>> SoC: RK3588S v0
>> SoC: RK3588S v1
>> SoC: RK3588S2 v1
>>
>> when U-Boot proper is running.
>>
>> U-Boot 2025.01-rc1 (Nov 02 2024 - 20:19:01 +0000)
>>
>> Model: Generic RK3588S/RK3588
>> SoC: RK3588S2 v1
>> DRAM: 8 GiB
>>
>> Information about the SoC model, variant and version is read from OTP.
>>
>> Also update rk3588s-u-boot.dtsi to include OTP in U-Boot pre-reloc phase,
>> where checkboard() is called.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Jonas Karlman <jo...@kwiboo.se>
>> ---
>> v2:
>> - Update commit message
>> - Update code comments
>> - Drop generic-rk3588_defconfig change
>> ---
>> arch/arm/dts/rk3588s-u-boot.dtsi | 4 ++
>> arch/arm/mach-rockchip/rk3588/rk3588.c | 58 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>> 2 files changed, 62 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/arm/dts/rk3588s-u-boot.dtsi
>> b/arch/arm/dts/rk3588s-u-boot.dtsi
>> index 09d8b311cec5..8880d162b11c 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm/dts/rk3588s-u-boot.dtsi
>> +++ b/arch/arm/dts/rk3588s-u-boot.dtsi
>> @@ -69,6 +69,10 @@
>> bootph-all;
>> };
>>
>> +&otp {
>> + bootph-some-ram;
>> +};
>> +
>> &pcfg_pull_down {
>> bootph-all;
>> };
>> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-rockchip/rk3588/rk3588.c
>> b/arch/arm/mach-rockchip/rk3588/rk3588.c
>> index e2dac2a5b806..f9da7a6f1477 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm/mach-rockchip/rk3588/rk3588.c
>> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-rockchip/rk3588/rk3588.c
>> @@ -4,6 +4,8 @@
>> * Copyright (c) 2022 Edgeble AI Technologies Pvt. Ltd.
>> */
>>
>> +#include <dm.h>
>> +#include <misc.h>
>> #include <spl.h>
>> #include <asm/armv8/mmu.h>
>> #include <asm/arch-rockchip/bootrom.h>
>> @@ -178,3 +180,59 @@ int arch_cpu_init(void)
>> return 0;
>> }
>> #endif
>> +
>> +#define RK3588_OTP_CPU_CODE_OFFSET 0x02
>> +#define RK3588_OTP_SPECIFICATION_OFFSET 0x06
>> +#define RK3588_OTP_CPU_VERSION_OFFSET 0x1c
>> +
>> +int checkboard(void)
>> +{
>> + u8 cpu_code[2], specification, package, cpu_version;
>> + struct udevice *dev;
>> + char suffix[3];
>> + int ret;
>> +
>> + ret = uclass_get_device_by_driver(UCLASS_MISC,
>> + DM_DRIVER_GET(rockchip_otp), &dev);
>> + if (ret) {
>> + debug("%s: could not find otp device, ret=%d\n", __func__, ret);
>
> We should probably start using log_debug instead?
I guess we should?, not sure why there is two different and what the
difference is. Have typically only ever used debug() or printf(), so I
just went with what was used in the code copied from board.c.
>
> I guess with #define LOG_CATEGORY LOGC_ARCH
>
> at the top?
I can give it a try, what/how is the log category used for?
My simple debug workflow is just to add a '#define LOG_DEBUG' at top of
a file when I want some more debug info.
>
>> + return 0;
>> + }
>> +
>> + /* cpu-code: SoC model, e.g. 0x35 0x82 or 0x35 0x88 */
>> + ret = misc_read(dev, RK3588_OTP_CPU_CODE_OFFSET, cpu_code, 2);
>
> This will fail if CONFIG_MISC=n which is neither selected nor implied
> for RK3588.
Good catch, did not test that scenario, will fix in a v3.
>
> I tested on multiple RK3588 Jaguar, and the commercial (RK3588) grade
> ones all showed RK3588 v0.
>
> The one industrial grade (RK3588J) showed RK3588J v1.
Thanks for confirming this works on a J-variant.
>
> I'm really not sure what this version number is for. If even Kever
> doesn't know what it means, I am not sure it makes sense to print it?
For rk356x there is some special handling for cpu-version <> 0 in vendor
code, and DT describe a cpu-version nvmem cell, so thought it could be
useful debug information. However it may just cause more confusion since
there is no clear information on what the different cpu-version mean.
Will drop the cpu-version information in a v3.
>
> FWIW, the Linux kernel now exposes different nvmem devices for each cell
> and since we have a cell defined for the three OTP ranges you're using
> here, maybe it'd make sense to use that instead of hardcoding the
> offsets and size in here? Not a blocker for this though as I don't think
> it brings THAT much value to those fixed NVMEM layouts.
Took a quick peek at nvmem cell support in U-Boot and look like 'bits' prop
is not supported and nvmem-cells/nvmem-cell-names may have to be used.
Probably easier to use that in a future series that also converts this
into a possible sysinfo driver using a DT node similar to:
sysinfo {
compatible = "rockchip,rk3588-sysinfo";
bootph-some-ram;
nvmem-cells = <&cpu_code>, <&otp_id>, ...;
nvmem-cell-names = "soc", "id", ...;
};
Something for the future :-)
Regards,
Jonas
>
> Cheers,
> Quentin
