On 27/10/2024 16:16, Marek Vasut wrote:
> On 10/24/24 5:24 PM, Paul Barker wrote:
>> In rzg2l_pinconf_set(), there are no new variables defined in the case
>> statement for PIN_CONFIG_INPUT_ENABLE so no additional scope is needed.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Paul Barker <paul.barker...@bp.renesas.com>
> Reviewed-by: Marek Vasut <marek.vasut+rene...@mailbox.org>
> 
> btw. it might make sense to split the series per subsystem so it can go 
> in piece by piece.

I could split this into clk (patch 1), pinctrl (patch 2-4), Ethernet phy
(patch 5-8) and ravb prep patches (9-10), sent as independent series.
The support for RZ/G2L Ethernet (patches 11 & 12) would have to wait
until all those series are merged. The devicetree changes (patches 13 &
14) could be sent once the pinctrl patches are merged.

I think that this would delay things and prevent RZ/G2L Ethernet support
from landing in v2024.01, so I sent this as one series. I can break it
up if needed though. Let me know what you would prefer.

Thanks,

-- 
Paul Barker

Attachment: OpenPGP_0x27F4B3459F002257.asc
Description: OpenPGP public key

Attachment: OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Reply via email to