On 27/10/2024 16:16, Marek Vasut wrote: > On 10/24/24 5:24 PM, Paul Barker wrote: >> In rzg2l_pinconf_set(), there are no new variables defined in the case >> statement for PIN_CONFIG_INPUT_ENABLE so no additional scope is needed. >> >> Signed-off-by: Paul Barker <paul.barker...@bp.renesas.com> > Reviewed-by: Marek Vasut <marek.vasut+rene...@mailbox.org> > > btw. it might make sense to split the series per subsystem so it can go > in piece by piece.
I could split this into clk (patch 1), pinctrl (patch 2-4), Ethernet phy (patch 5-8) and ravb prep patches (9-10), sent as independent series. The support for RZ/G2L Ethernet (patches 11 & 12) would have to wait until all those series are merged. The devicetree changes (patches 13 & 14) could be sent once the pinctrl patches are merged. I think that this would delay things and prevent RZ/G2L Ethernet support from landing in v2024.01, so I sent this as one series. I can break it up if needed though. Let me know what you would prefer. Thanks, -- Paul Barker
OpenPGP_0x27F4B3459F002257.asc
Description: OpenPGP public key
OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature