On Fri, 29 Apr 2011 15:16:59 -0500 Kumar Gala <ga...@kernel.crashing.org> wrote:
> > On Apr 29, 2011, at 12:36 PM, Tabi Timur-B04825 wrote: > > > > > What about this patch: > > > > http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/71614/ > > > > It was ACK'd by gvb: > > > > http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2011-April/089791.html > > I'd rather we just fix the addresses up rather than verifying them. As I pointed out before, you can't fix up every possible error. If someone passes a 32-bit device tree to a 36-bit U-Boot, we can't fix that up sanely. But we can detect it, and give a useful message rather than a hang. Perhaps some subset of the things that are checked (e.g. PCI addresses) would me more appropriately updated by U-Boot, though. -Scott _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
