On 04/27/2011 04:57 PM, Detlev Zundel wrote: > I see. Can't we consolidate all those functions into more general > functions higher up in the specialization graph?
As I can see, the get_cpu_rev() is already a generalized function, used in more processors. IMHO we should switch back to the usual prototype u32 get_cpu_rev(), and print_cpuinfo() should transform the revision number in a human readable way. > I.e. why have static > non-conforming functions when we could have one generic function to > handle all users? Yes, agree. Really I have not seen that get_cpu_rev() changed returning a string, instead of u32 as usual. This must be fixed. Stefano -- ===================================================================== DENX Software Engineering GmbH, MD: Wolfgang Denk & Detlev Zundel HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany Phone: +49-8142-66989-0 Fax: +49-8142-66989-80 Email: [email protected] ===================================================================== _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list [email protected] http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
