сб, 10 серп. 2024 р. о 01:02 Tom Rini <tr...@konsulko.com> пише: > > On Fri, Aug 09, 2024 at 08:57:03AM +0300, Svyatoslav Ryhel wrote: > > пт, 9 серп. 2024 р. о 08:49 Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.g...@gmx.de> пише: > > > > > > > > > > > > Am 7. August 2024 14:10:24 MESZ schrieb Svyatoslav Ryhel > > > <clamo...@gmail.com>: > > > >TegraPT is compatible with EFI part but it can't pass Protective MBR > > > >check. > > > >Skip this check if CONFIG_TEGRA_PARTITION is enabled, storage uclass is > > > >MMC > > > >and devnum is 0. Note, eMMC on supported devices MUST be aliased to mmc0. > > > > > > Why wouldn't you use U-Boot's gpt command to fix the non-conformant > > > partition table? > > > > > > > I would love to, but I am forced to use TegraPT and DON'T modify it. > > Tegra114 bootloader is RSA signed and there is no possible way to > > replace it with open source one unless vendor allows this. SO I am > > stuck with vendor bootloader to chainload from which enforces TegraPT > > as well. Modification of existing partition table can irreversibly > > brick the device. > > Can we please incorporate some of this information to the help text, so > it's clear what the use case is? Thanks.
Sure, though usually those who know what they are dealing with will understand. BTW, Tom, may I pick patchsets assigned to Thierry (tagr) via Tegra custodian tree if they pass? Even if they, apart being related to Tegra, belong to different subsystems (like this patch and, for example, tegra gpio driver changes). > -- > Tom
