On Sun, Apr 24, 2011 at 7:53 PM, Wolfgang Denk <w...@denx.de> wrote: > Dear Michael Spang, > > In message <1300391223-11879-6-git-send-email-msp...@csclub.uwaterloo.ca> you > wrote: >> For ARM, the CONFIG_SKIP_LOWLEVEL_INIT option implies that the >> cpu_init_crit and lowlevel_init assembly functions are skipped. We may >> want to skip only lowlevel_init, so rename the option that skips both >> to CONFIG_SKIP_CPU_INIT_CRIT. The MIPS option of the same name >> is not renamed. > > This is an inconsistency between architectures which I dislike. > > Also, what in case we should want to skip only cpu_init_crit and not > lowlevel_init? If we need to handle these separately, then we need 2 > CONFIG options.
The CPU initialization is idempotent, so I can't think of a reason why it would be required to skip it. So, we might be able to change CONFIG_SKIP_CPU_INIT_CRIT to CONFIG_SKIP_LOWLEVEL_INIT in most cases. I'm just hesitant to do so because I don't have a variety of boards to test on. Michael _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
