Hi Sughosh, On Mon, 29 Jul 2024 at 02:53, Sughosh Ganu <sughosh.g...@linaro.org> wrote: > > On Fri, 26 Jul 2024 at 05:02, Simon Glass <s...@chromium.org> wrote: > > > > Hi Sughosh, > > > > On Wed, 24 Jul 2024 at 00:05, Sughosh Ganu <sughosh.g...@linaro.org> wrote: > > > > > > Instead of a randomly selected address, use an LMB allocated one for > > > reading the file into memory. With the LMB map now being persistent > > > and global, the address used for reading the file might be already > > > allocated as non-overwritable, resulting in a failure. Get a valid > > > address from LMB and then read the file to that address. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Sughosh Ganu <sughosh.g...@linaro.org> > > > --- > > > Changes since rfc: None > > > > > > test/boot/cedit.c | 6 +++++- > > > 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > > > > > > No, we should not start putting lmb into tests like this. > > The test fails if the address is not allocated through an lmb api. > Although I can check why.
Neither am I, but you did put the tcg in the same region so perhaps that is an issue? Sandbox is designed so that low memory regions can be used in tests. I pointed you to the memory-map docs. Regards, SImon
