Hi Tom, On Tue, 2 Jul 2024 at 20:04, Tom Rini <tr...@konsulko.com> wrote: > > On Tue, Jul 02, 2024 at 04:51:30PM +0100, Simon Glass wrote: > > > Hi Tom, > > > > This is for -next but we need to figure out the patch I just sent > > first. I can redo the pull if that patch is acceptable, or you can > > pick that up first. > > I thought you meant the i.MX9 patch, but with that applied before your > series, CI now fails on those platforms. So yes, lets hold off on > whatever is causing that for now and rebase to exclude it.
Yes, I see it still fails in CI although it now works locally. I ran out of time to look at it but I'm hoping that the maintainer will take a look at the patch. I also find that buildman retries each build that creates warnings, including the missing-binary ones. It is mostly a waste of time, so I would like to figure out a way around that. For now I will resend the PR without the 'retry' commit. Regards, Simon
