On Thu, Jun 27, 2024 at 8:31 AM Mikhail Kshevetskiy <mikhail.kshevets...@iopsys.eu> wrote: > > Signed-off-by: Mikhail Kshevetskiy <mikhail.kshevets...@iopsys.eu> > --- > drivers/spi/soft_spi.c | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/spi/soft_spi.c b/drivers/spi/soft_spi.c > index 0fa14339bdc..3fe62818a44 100644 > --- a/drivers/spi/soft_spi.c > +++ b/drivers/spi/soft_spi.c > @@ -272,7 +272,7 @@ static int soft_spi_probe(struct udevice *dev) > ret = gpio_request_by_name(dev, "gpio-miso", 0, &plat->miso, > GPIOD_IS_IN); > if (ret) > - ret = gpio_request_by_name(dev, "gpio-miso", 0, &plat->miso, > + ret = gpio_request_by_name(dev, "miso-gpios", 0, &plat->miso,
We should support the deprecated 'gpio-miso' property and the preferred 'miso-gpios' one. The same applies for gpio-sck and gpio-mosi. > GPIOD_IS_IN); > if (ret) > plat->flags |= SPI_MASTER_NO_RX; > -- > 2.43.0 >