Hi Quentin, Thanks for the review!
On mar., juin 04, 2024 at 14:22, Quentin Schulz <quentin.sch...@cherry.de> wrote: > Hi Mattijs, > > On 6/4/24 2:04 PM, Mattijs Korpershoek wrote: [...] >> >> There seems indeed to be some inconsistencies around bootmeths versus >> bootmethods. >> >> To me, we should use 'bootmeth' everywhere. >> >> Simon, as the maintainer of bootflow, do you agree ? >> >> I can spin up another patch to fix this. >> > > c.f. https://lore.kernel.org/u-boot/20211023232635.9195-1-...@chromium.org/ > > """ > For version 2, a new naming scheme is used as above: > > - bootdev is used instead of bootdevice, because 'device' is overused, > is everywhere in U-Boot, can be confused with udevice > - bootmeth - because 'method' is too vanilla, appears 1300 times in > U-Boot > """ > > SO I think we should change it to bootmeth(s) indeed. Ah, thank you for the link, that is helpful. I've done the global rename, made this into a series here: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240604-bootmeth-typos-v2-0-821683a95...@baylibre.com > > Reviewed-by: Quentin Schulz <quentin.sch...@cherry.de> > > Thanks, > Quentin
