Reviewed-by: Tanmay Shah <tanmay.s...@amd.com>

On 5/31/24 1:06 AM, Michal Simek wrote:
> 
> 
> On 5/31/24 00:16, Tanmay Shah wrote:
>> 
>> 
>> On 5/30/24 5:39 AM, Michal Simek wrote:
>>> remoteproc node should be updated to be aligned with the latest dt-schema.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Michal Simek <michal.si...@amd.com>
>>> ---
>>>
>>> Once we push all dts to Linux we can change to OF_UPSTREAM but till that
>>> time we need to keep DTSes in sync.
>>> ---
>>>   arch/arm/dts/zynqmp.dtsi                      | 67 +++++++++++++++++--
>>>   include/dt-bindings/power/xlnx-zynqmp-power.h | 17 ++---
>>>   2 files changed, 68 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/arch/arm/dts/zynqmp.dtsi b/arch/arm/dts/zynqmp.dtsi
>>> index 53a606c340a4..34f592c1a85f 100644
>>> --- a/arch/arm/dts/zynqmp.dtsi
>>> +++ b/arch/arm/dts/zynqmp.dtsi
>>> @@ -314,19 +314,76 @@
>>>             ranges;
>>>     };
>>>   
>>> -   remoteproc {
>>> +   rproc_lockstep: remoteproc@ffe00000 {
>>>             compatible = "xlnx,zynqmp-r5fss";
>>>             xlnx,cluster-mode = <1>;
>>> +           xlnx,tcm-mode = <1>;
>>>   
>>> -           r5f-0 {
>>> +           #address-cells = <2>;
>>> +           #size-cells = <2>;
>>> +
>>> +           ranges = <0x0 0x0 0x0 0xffe00000 0x0 0x10000>,
>>> +                    <0x0 0x20000 0x0 0xffe20000 0x0 0x10000>,
>>> +                    <0x0 0x10000 0x0 0xffe10000 0x0 0x10000>,
>>> +                    <0x0 0x30000 0x0 0xffe30000 0x0 0x10000>;
>>> +
>>> +           r5f@0 {
>>> +                   compatible = "xlnx,zynqmp-r5f";
>>> +                   reg = <0x0 0x0 0x0 0x10000>,
>>> +                         <0x0 0x20000 0x0 0x10000>,
>>> +                         <0x0 0x10000 0x0 0x10000>,
>>> +                         <0x0 0x30000 0x0 0x10000>;
>>> +                   reg-names = "atcm0", "btcm0", "atcm1", "btcm1";
>>> +                   power-domains = <&zynqmp_firmware PD_RPU_0>,
>>> +                                   <&zynqmp_firmware PD_R5_0_ATCM>,
>>> +                                   <&zynqmp_firmware PD_R5_0_BTCM>,
>>> +                                   <&zynqmp_firmware PD_R5_1_ATCM>,
>>> +                                   <&zynqmp_firmware PD_R5_1_BTCM>;
>>> +                   memory-region = <&rproc_0_fw_image>;
>>> +           };
>>> +
>>> +           r5f@1 {
>>> +                   compatible = "xlnx,zynqmp-r5f";
>>> +                   reg = <0x1 0x0 0x0 0x10000>, <0x1 0x20000 0x0 0x10000>;
>>> +                   reg-names = "atcm0", "btcm0";
>>> +                   power-domains = <&zynqmp_firmware PD_RPU_1>,
>>> +                                   <&zynqmp_firmware PD_R5_1_ATCM>,
>>> +                                   <&zynqmp_firmware PD_R5_1_BTCM>;
>>> +                   memory-region = <&rproc_1_fw_image>;
>>> +           };
>>> +   };
>>> +
>>> +   rproc_split: remoteproc-split@ffe00000 {
>>> +           status = "disabled";
>>> +           compatible = "xlnx,zynqmp-r5fss";
>>> +           xlnx,cluster-mode = <0>;
>>> +           xlnx,tcm-mode = <0>;
>>> +
>>> +           #address-cells = <2>;
>>> +           #size-cells = <2>;
>>> +
>>> +           ranges = <0x0 0x0 0x0 0xffe00000 0x0 0x10000>,
>>> +                    <0x0 0x20000 0x0 0xffe20000 0x0 0x10000>,
>>> +                    <0x1 0x0 0x0 0xffe90000 0x0 0x10000>,
>>> +                    <0x1 0x20000 0x0 0xffeb0000 0x0 0x10000>;
>>> +
>>> +           r5f@0 {
>>>                     compatible = "xlnx,zynqmp-r5f";
>>> -                   power-domains = <&zynqmp_firmware PD_RPU_0>;
>>> +                   reg = <0x0 0x0 0x0 0x10000>, <0x0 0x20000 0x0 0x10000>;
>>> +                   reg-names = "atcm0", "btcm0";
>>> +                   power-domains = <&zynqmp_firmware PD_RPU_0>,
>>> +                                   <&zynqmp_firmware PD_R5_0_ATCM>,
>>> +                                   <&zynqmp_firmware PD_R5_0_BTCM>;
>>>                     memory-region = <&rproc_0_fw_image>;
>>>             };
>>>   
>>> -           r5f-1 {
>>> +           r5f@1 {
>>>                     compatible = "xlnx,zynqmp-r5f";
>>> -                   power-domains = <&zynqmp_firmware PD_RPU_1>;
>>> +                   reg = <0x1 0x0 0x0 0x10000>, <0x1 0x20000 0x0 0x10000>;
>>> +                   reg-names = "atcm0", "btcm0";
>>> +                   power-domains = <&zynqmp_firmware PD_RPU_1>,
>>> +                                   <&zynqmp_firmware PD_R5_1_ATCM>,
>>> +                                   <&zynqmp_firmware PD_R5_1_BTCM>;
>>>                     memory-region = <&rproc_1_fw_image>;
>>>             };
>>>     };
>>> diff --git a/include/dt-bindings/power/xlnx-zynqmp-power.h 
>>> b/include/dt-bindings/power/xlnx-zynqmp-power.h
>>> index e7eb0960480a..618024cbb20d 100644
>>> --- a/include/dt-bindings/power/xlnx-zynqmp-power.h
>>> +++ b/include/dt-bindings/power/xlnx-zynqmp-power.h
>>> @@ -6,16 +6,12 @@
>>>   #ifndef _DT_BINDINGS_ZYNQMP_POWER_H
>>>   #define _DT_BINDINGS_ZYNQMP_POWER_H
>>>   
>>> -#define            PD_RPU_0        6
>>> -#define            PD_RPU_1        7
>>> -#define            PD_OCM_BANK_0   11
>>> -#define            PD_OCM_BANK_1   12
>>> -#define            PD_OCM_BANK_2   13
>>> -#define            PD_OCM_BANK_3   14
>>> -#define            PD_TCM_BANK_0   15
>>> -#define            PD_TCM_BANK_1   16
>>> -#define            PD_TCM_BANK_2   17
>>> -#define            PD_TCM_BANK_3   18
>>> +#define            PD_RPU_0        7
>>> +#define            PD_RPU_1        8
>>> +#define            PD_R5_0_ATCM    15
>>> +#define            PD_R5_0_BTCM    16
>>> +#define            PD_R5_1_ATCM    17
>>> +#define            PD_R5_1_BTCM    18
>>>   #define           PD_USB_0        22
>>>   #define           PD_USB_1        23
>>>   #define           PD_TTC_0        24
>>> @@ -45,6 +41,5 @@
>>>   #define           PD_CAN_1        48
>>>   #define           PD_GPU          58
>>>   #define           PD_PCIE         59
>>> -#define            PD_PL           69
>> 
>> This last change looks unrelated. Other than that looks good to me.
> 
> You are using new PD_R5_1_ATCM, etc that's why also this part is needed.
> 
> That removing PD_PL is unrelated. I can split it but not sure if it is worth 
> of 
> separate patch but can be done for sure.
> 

Yeah I meant removing PD_PL. I am okay to include in this patch as well.

> Thanks,
> Michal
> 

Reply via email to