On 14/04/11 16:17, Albert ARIBAUD wrote:
> Hi Graeme,
>
> Le 11/04/2011 15:11, Graeme Russ a écrit :
>
>> So my RFC is twofold:
>> 1) Should we start to systematically remove unused options
>
> I would tend to answer 'yes'. Unused options should not clobber code or
> documentation.
>
>> 2) Should we centralise all options in a single README (or two, one for
>> standard CONFIG options and one for CONFIG_SYS options)?
>
> That would be nice indeed, but it requires all options to have the same
> semantics over all arches. While this is highly desirable, it may not be
> true ATM -- just thinking out loud, haven't checked. But even if some
> options only make sense only for some arch(es), then we could always do
> it this way:
>
> doc/README.CONFIG_options
> doc/README.CONFIG_SYS_options
> doc/arch/README.CONFIG_options
Hmm, I have a better idea after I can to the realisation that the central
location for configuration options is Ctrl^F in the doc/ directory :)
doc/README.CONFIG_options.unused
doc/README.CONFIG_options.undocumented
I will tweak my scripts to produce these two files and see what the result is.
Regards,
Graeme
_______________________________________________
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
