On 4/27/24 3:29 AM, E Shattow wrote:
Hi Marek,
On Fri, Apr 26, 2024 at 5:49 PM Marek Vasut <ma...@denx.de> wrote:
[...]
diff --git a/include/mmc.h b/include/mmc.h
index 4b8327f1f93b..7243bd761202 100644
--- a/include/mmc.h
+++ b/include/mmc.h
@@ -381,6 +381,21 @@ enum mmc_voltage {
#define MMC_TIMING_MMC_HS200 9
#define MMC_TIMING_MMC_HS400 10
+/* emmc hardware partition values */
+enum emmc_hwpart {
+ EMMC_HWPART_DEFAULT = 0,
+ EMMC_HWPART_BOOT0 = 1,
+ EMMC_HWPART_BOOT1 = 2,
+ EMMC_HWPART_GP1 = 3,
+ EMMC_HWPART_GP2 = 4,
+ EMMC_HWPART_GP3 = 5,
+ EMMC_HWPART_GP4 = 6,
+ EMMC_HWPART_USER = 7,
+};
+
+/* emmc hardware partition names */
+extern const char *emmc_hwpart_names[];
Maybe the array should have fixed size here, i.e. 8 ?
Is there an ABI reason to do so? Can you explain further why it would
be needed to do that?
It has nothing to do with ABI, it is only to let the compiler validate
that nobody would index the array with index > 7 by accident.
