Kumar Gala wrote:
> what about this patch?

I missed this one.  Unfortunately, it conflicts with my patch.  I'll have to 
rewrite this one to make it work.

Plus, there were problems with it.  For instance, I'm not crazy about the 
setenv() calls (I NAK'd an earlier internal version of this patch that had 
similar calls).

I'll take care of it next week.

-- 
Timur Tabi
Linux kernel developer
_______________________________________________
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot

Reply via email to